Here is a concise summary of the provided transcript:
**Context:** A hearing or investigation into the use of funds for the renovation and maintenance of an official residence and related government buildings.
**Key Points:**
1. **Funding Discrepancies:**
* 60 million won spent on yard renovation, with questionable value for money (e.g., 4.8 million won for flower pots).
* 140 million won spent on official residence renovation over 7 months, with concerns about the scale of work done.
2. **Lack of Transparency:**
* Insufficient documentation and photos provided to justify expenses.
* Examples include:
+ 30 million won streetlights (later discounted to 24 million won) with questionable unit pricing.
+ 11.13 million won for sink and shower repairs, with minimal visible changes.
+ 3.08 million won for building cleaning, considered excessive.
3. **Respondent's Defense:**
* Claims the official residence was in a state of disrepair (85% of the house was in need of renovation).
* Attributes high costs to necessary renovations after the previous director's sudden departure.
* Provides additional context and photos to clarify some expenses, acknowledging potential misunderstandings.
4. **Next Steps:**
* Further investigation and clarification of expenses through audits or inspections.
* Review of procedures for transparency and accountability in government funding usage.
Here are the extracted key facts, each with a number and a short sentence, excluding opinions:
1. **60 million won** was spent on the yard of the official residence.
2. **140 million won** was allocated for the renovation of the official residence over 7 months.
3. The official residence had multiple buildings, including:
* Main building
* 1st annex
* 2nd annex
* Sikdam
* Dasong building
* Daycare center
* Audit training center
* Property annex
* Ancestral rite annex
4. **64% of the entire building maintenance cost** for one year was spent on the official residence (initial claim).
5. The **actual percentage spent on the official residence** is approximately **4.3%** of the total maintenance cost for all 9 government buildings.
6. **7,560 million won** was the total spent on renovation and repair of the official residence (as per a fact-check).
7. **Breakdown of costs for some specific expenses**:
* Pot materials for gardening: **4.8 million won**
* Streetlights: **30 million won** (originally), **24 million won** (after discount)
* Repairing sink and shower: **11.13 million won**
* Bathroom repairs: **8.56 million won**
* Cleaning the building: **3.08 million won**
* Beam projector installation (from general accommodation fees): **no specific amount mentioned in the provided text snippet**
8. **Condition of the official residence** before renovation:
* The yard was described as "abandoned land" and "somewhat barren".
* One of the buildings was empty for about 6 months before renovation.