Here is a concise summary of the provided transcript:
**Situation:** The speaker's "plate" (apparently a valuable item worth 10 million) was taken by someone/something known as "Zap".
**Conversation Overview:**
* The speaker and an "old man" discuss the situation, feeling helpless and anxious.
* They decide to gather money to offer to Zap in exchange for the plate.
* After collecting approximately 400-500 Reais (a relatively small amount compared to the plate's worth), they attempt to negotiate with Zap.
* Zap rejects the money and instead demands a humiliating apology from the speaker, which they reluctantly agree to, recording themselves apologizing on their knees.
* The speaker hopes that after posting the apology, Zap will return the valuable plate.
Here are the extracted key facts in short sentences, numbered for reference:
1. **Event Timeline**: The conversation starts with a reference to an event that occurred a while back, involving someone named Zap.
2. **Missing Item**: A "plate" (possibly a sign or a document) worth 10 million is missing, taken by Zap.
3. **Initial Offer**: An initial offer to Zap is discussed, with a proposal to exchange something of value for the plate's return.
4. **Financial Gatherings**:
* One person gathers R$180 (approximately) to offer to Zap.
* Another person contributes R$50.
* A total of around R$400 is gathered from everyone in the house.
5. **Proposal Details**:
* The group proposes to exchange approximately R$400 for the return of the 10 million plate.
6. **Additional Demands by Zap**:
* Zap requests an apology in a specific manner (on knees, recorded).
7. **Apology and Recording**:
* The apology is made on knees, recorded, and intended to be posted.
8. **Post-Apology Plan**:
* After posting the apology, the plan is to retrieve the sign.
**Notes on Exclusions**:
- Opinions (e.g., "you're crazy", "humiliating") are excluded as per your request.
- Repetitive statements or emotional expressions not adding new factual information are also excluded.
- The context of "Zap", the nature of the "plate" (sign/document), and the setting (e.g., a game, a real scenario) are not explicitly defined in the extracted facts, as these interpretations could be subjective without additional context.