Here is a concise summary of the provided text:
**Title:** The Sidemen's Most Savage Moments
**Content Summary:**
* The video creator shares a compilation of the most savage moments from the Sidemen (a British YouTube group)
* The moments include:
+ JJ stealing a video idea and executing it without crediting others
+ Insults and jokes about group members' appearances, relationships, and personalities
+ A gift exchange where one member (Ethan) intentionally went over budget, poking fun at another member (JJ)
+ A chaotic interview with The Times, where members (Harry and JJ) got drunk to cope with nerves
* The creator engages with the audience, asking for feedback on the most savage moment and if any crossed a line
* The video concludes with an invitation for viewers to share their thoughts and a tease for the next day's content.
Here are the extracted key facts in short sentences, numbered for reference:
1. **Video Topic**: The video discusses the "most savage moments" of the Sidemen.
2. **Creator's Age**: JJ, the creator, is 26 years old.
3. **Gift Budget**: The Sidemen had a budget of $10,000 to spend on each other for gifts.
4. **Gift Details**: JJ received a Moonpig card as part of his gift.
5. **Ethan's Spending**: Ethan added a $4,000 item (a 10th bandana) to his gift, possibly exceeding the budget.
6. **Alternative Gift Option**: For $10,000, JJ could have gotten 10 Gucci headbands instead.
7. **Interview Mentioned**: The group had an interview with The Times, which they found nerve-wracking.
8. **Drinking Game During Interview**: Harry suggested a drinking game during the interview to ease tensions.
9. **Compilation Length**: The creator feels the savage moments could have filled a 2-hour compilation.
**Notes:**
- Facts are limited to verifiable information and exclude personal opinions or subjective interpretations.
- Some names mentioned (e.g., Harry, JJ, Vic, Ethan, Josh, Talia, KSI) are presumably part of the Sidemen group or associated with them, but their relationships or roles are not detailed here as they are not explicitly stated as facts in the provided context.