This is a YouTube video by Felps, a gamer, where he plays a game that parodies hacking. The game involves hacking various things, starting with grocery bags, then progressing to more complex tasks like tricking people with calculus, prank calling, and eventually hacking into NASA and the Pentagon.
Throughout the video, Felps provides commentary and reactions to the game, often making humorous remarks and sarcastic comments. The game's progression becomes increasingly absurd, with Felps eventually competing against a character from the game Watch Dogs to see who can hack the most old ladies.
The video ends with Felps completing the game and reflecting on the experience. He thanks his viewers for watching and invites them to subscribe to his channel and try the game for themselves.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The video is hosted by Felps, who is a gamer and content creator.
2. The video is about a game where the player has to hack various things to progress.
3. The game starts with hacking grocery bags.
4. The player can buy items with the money earned from hacking.
5. The player buys a calculator to trick people on calculus.
6. The player also buys a cellphone to prank call people.
7. The player progresses through various levels, including hacking bicycles and creating fake apps.
8. The player buys a computer without a video card to hack light games.
9. The player hacks the game "Rabbo" (also known as Habbo) to earn more money.
10. The player buys a notebook from Negativo for 300 reais.
11. The player hacks the game "Grand Theft Auto 5".
12. The player's ultimate goal is to hack NASA.
13. After hacking NASA, the player is challenged to hack the Pentagon.
14. The player extracts as much money as possible from the Pentagon's computer.
15. The player's final challenge is to defeat a character from the game "Watch Dogs" by hacking more old ladies.
16. The video ends with Felps thanking his viewers and inviting them to subscribe to his channel.
Note: Some of the facts may seem trivial or humorous, but they are still factual statements about the content of the video.