The provided text appears to be a transcription of an audio or video recording, likely from a confrontation or discussion between an individual and law enforcement or government officials in Russia. The conversation is often disjointed and difficult to follow, but some key points can be gleaned:
- The individual is expressing frustration and discontent with the current state of affairs, mentioning Putin and the treatment of people.
- They are at a police station or government office, where they are discussing various issues, including the behavior of officials, the handling of complaints, and the treatment of citizens.
- The individual mentions being detained, kidnapped, or taken by authorities, and expresses concerns about the actions of law enforcement and government officials.
- They also discuss the importance of accountability, transparency, and the rule of law, suggesting that these principles are not being upheld.
- The conversation touches on themes of corruption, abuse of power, and the suppression of dissent or free speech.
- The individual appears to be advocating for change and criticizing the current system, while the authorities seem to be trying to deflect or downplay the issues.
Overall, the conversation suggests a tense and confrontational atmosphere, with the individual pushing for accountability and reform, and the authorities resisting or dismissing these efforts.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. Someone mentions a person named Putin.
2. A person named Vadim is mentioned as having stolen a territory from the speaker.
3. There is a discussion about a journalist who was detained.
4. A person named Safronov Pavel is mentioned.
5. Someone talks about an internal affairs office in Ryazan.
6. A lieutenant colonel is mentioned as being in charge.
7. There is a mention of a code that needs to be used.
8. A person named Victoria is mentioned as not knowing the passport number of a visitor.
9. Someone is asked to write an explanation.
10. A statement was made by the speaker about filming being prohibited.
11. A sign was removed after the speaker made a statement.
12. A person is mentioned as being kidnapped and brought to a department.
13. An order is mentioned, and someone is asked to accept an appeal.
14. Someone is mentioned as not wanting to make an appeal.
15. A person named Vasily Maxim Alexander is mentioned.
16. A person's car is mentioned as being in the courtyard of the police station.
17. Someone mentions that they are responsible for the management.
18. A person's machine is mentioned as bringing down real products and services.
19. The police are mentioned as having a charter.
20. Someone mentions that they launched an appeal.
21. A person is mentioned as gathering people for the wrong reason.
22. A person is told to stop filming.
23. An official mentions that they will carry out a check.
24. Someone mentions that they wrote a statement a year ago about a poster that prohibited filming.
25. The poster was removed after the statement was made, but the problem persisted.