The video discusses and criticizes YouTube creators who make "top 10" list videos, particularly those that are insensitive or clickbait, such as "Top 10 YouTubers who died" or "Top 10 YouTubers who were murdered". The creator is upset that these videos are made to profit from the deaths of others, and that they often come across as insensitive or dismissive of the tragedy. They also point out that even if the creators claim to donate the ad revenue to the families, it's still a way for them to gain views and subscribers. The video is a commentary on the sensationalism and lack of respect for the deceased in these types of videos.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The content is about criticizing top 10 list videos on YouTube.
2. The videos being criticized include "Top 10 YouTubers who died" and "Top 10 YouTubers who were murdered".
3. The creator of the content is upset about the insensitivity of these videos.
4. The videos being criticized are trying to profit from the deaths of others.
5. The creator mentions that some of the videos have annotations asking viewers to like and subscribe.
6. The creator questions the ranking of people's deaths in the top 10 lists.
7. The creator doubts that the video creators are donating money to the families of the deceased.
8. The creator points out that ad revenue can still be earned from videos even if ads are not displayed.
9. The creator criticizes the video creators for trying to justify their actions by saying they are not making money from the videos.
10. The creator's video does not have ads, but admits that it may still benefit from increased views and subscriptions.