the "Relatable" content invasion - Summary

Summary

The script appears to be a commentary on a YouTube video that tries to be relatable and funny but falls short. The commentator criticizes the video for its awkward attempts at humor, lack of genuine relatability, and poor production quality. They also point out instances of sexism, poor timing, and ridiculous situations that are not relatable to everyday life. The commentator sarcastically praises the creators for managing to make three videos that are not relatable, suggesting that YouTube is promoting them out of sympathy.

Facts

Here are the key facts extracted from the text:

1. A YouTuber is discussing relatable content and its definition.
2. The YouTuber mentions a trend of videos with "relatable" content that are not actually relatable.
3. The YouTuber shares examples of these videos, including one with a girl trying to do everyday tasks with long nails.
4. The YouTuber also shares an example of a video with a girl trying to carry groceries and struggling.
5. The YouTuber criticizes the narration in these videos, saying it makes them less enjoyable.
6. The YouTuber mentions that they have a merch line that will be discontinued soon.
7. The YouTuber talks about spiders and how they are useful for the environment.
8. The YouTuber mentions that they were in Sweden for midsummer and had a problem with mosquitoes.
9. The YouTuber discusses the importance of being inclusive, especially when it comes to gender.
10. The YouTuber criticizes a video for having toilet paper roll facing the wrong direction.
11. The YouTuber asks viewers to subscribe for more relatable moments, but notes that this is annoying.
12. The YouTuber mentions that dog memes are still popular in 2019.
13. The YouTuber says that they are convinced that YouTube puts certain videos on the trending tab out of sympathy.
14. The video ends with a call to action to subscribe and like the video.