The conversation revolves around a controversy surrounding a Supreme Court Justice who also works as an artist. He is accused of not doing his own artwork, but instead, having an assistant create it for him. The Justice defends his actions by saying it's common in the art world to have others help with certain aspects of the work. However, the public is not convinced, and the conversation suggests that the Justice's behavior has caused a stir in society.
The speaker is critical of the Justice's actions, suggesting that he is not being honest with the public about his artistic process. The speaker also accuses the Justice of being "witty" but not empathetic towards those who may be affected by his actions.
The conversation also touches on the idea that the Justice is trying to convey a message through his art, but it's not being received well by the public. The speaker suggests that the Justice needs to rethink his approach and consider the public's perception of his actions.
Throughout the conversation, there are references to various art pieces, including "Blade of Grass" and "Hwatu," as well as mentions of other artists, such as Andy Warhol. The tone of the conversation is critical and analytical, with the speaker trying to understand the Justice's motivations and the implications of his actions.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. A person named Jeong has a daughter and is going to win an Academy Award.
2. Singer Cho Young-nam was put on trial for selling a painting as his own work.
3. The Supreme Court ruled that Cho Young-nam was not guilty.
4. Cho Young-nam's claim was that it is customary in the art world to complete animal and sea paintings with the help of others.
5. The court found it difficult to determine whether the help of others was necessary information for the buyer.
6. A person is drawing pictures of Hwatu, a popular play equipment in Korea.
7. The person started drawing Hwatu pictures because of the world-renowned pioneer of Babater, Andy Gohago Lee.
8. The person showed themselves working with their assistant on TV.
9. A former Supreme Court Justice is being asked to explain their actions.
10. The Justice is being asked about their intentions and whether they can be accepted by the public.
11. The person is being asked about their use of assistants in their art work.
12. The person is being asked about their expression of "elegant revenge" and whether it can be accepted by the public.
13. The person is being asked about their use of witty terminology and whether it can be accepted by the public.
14. The person is being asked about their consideration for others and whether they are being protected.
15. A person is discussing a pyramid method of communication.
16. The person is discussing a reverse pyramid, where the teacher is the first to say what they want to convey for the longest time.
17. The person is discussing the importance of conveying one's intentions and being honest.
18. The person is apologizing for causing social controversy and is willing to do something to make it right.