In this speech, Mr. Van Meijere expresses concerns about a proposed change in the election process. He argues that allowing voters to cast their ballots over three days, instead of one, would undermine the transparency and verifiability of elections. He highlights the importance of a properly organized election process with access for all stakeholders to ensure fairness. He also questions the lack of evidence supporting the proposed change and suggests that alternatives, such as increasing the time for voting, should be considered. Mrs. Leijten counters that elections should be transparent but does not necessarily agree with Mr. Van Meijere's objections to the proposed change.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. Mrs. Leijten expressed concerns about the government's control.
2. There is a proposal from D66 and the PV to discuss.
3. The proposal suggests allowing voters to cast their votes over three days.
4. This change may make the election process less transparent and controllable.
5. Transparency and verifiability are crucial for a functioning democracy.
6. The 2021 parliamentary elections marked a departure from the traditional election process.
7. A Radboud University investigation showed a decline in confidence in fair elections.
8. More than 10% of Dutch people lost confidence in fair elections.
9. The proposal lacks clear evidence of its benefits.
10. There is concern about the potential risks to transparency and verifiability.
11. The initiators should reconsider the proposal's impact on democracy.
12. There is a discussion about the need for evidence regarding election fairness.
13. The responsibility of ensuring fair and transparent elections rests with the government.
14. Mrs. Leijten emphasizes the importance of transparent and reliable elections.
15. There is a call to vote against the proposal to maintain transparency and control.