The streamer discusses their recent ban from Twitch for "racism and inciting hatred" after a joke they made about a Korean streamer. They claim the joke was innocent and intended to poke fun at stereotypes, but the Korean community took offense. The streamer then compares their situation to a New York Times editor who made racist comments about white people and was not fired or reprimanded. They argue that this is an example of "reverse discrimination" and that Western laws are one-sided and discriminatory. The streamer also announces their "sanctions" against Korea, including refusing to listen to K-pop or use Samsung technology. They also talk about the upcoming announcement of the Galaxy laptop 9 and express their disappointment with the lack of innovation in the latest Samsung devices.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The author has been streaming on Twitch since 2014.
2. The author was banned from Twitch for racism and inciting hatred.
3. The author claims they were banned for making a joke about a Korean streamer.
4. The author had organized a raid on a Korean streamer's channel, where they wrote messages in the chat.
5. The Korean streamer and their viewers responded with messages accusing the author of racism and Nazism.
6. The author claims that Western laws are one-sided and discriminatory.
7. The author cites an example of a New York Times editor who was not fired or banned for making racist comments about white people.
8. The author announces their own "sanctions" against Korea, including refusing to listen to K-pop, use Samsung technology, or look at Korean girls.
9. The author is waiting for the release of the Google Pixel 3 phone.
10. The author mentions the upcoming announcement of the Galaxy Laptop 9.
11. The author has been using the Galaxy Laptop 8 for six months and is happy with it.
12. The author feels that the situation with their ban is a case of reverse discrimination and bias.
Note: I've excluded opinions and focused on extracting facts from the text.