In a comedic parody of a courtroom drama, a defendant named Juicy is on trial for various charges, including bribery, disorderly conduct, and creating and perpetuating the "nono square" meme. The defense attorney argues that the prosecution's evidence is flimsy and that Juicy is innocent. The prosecution, however, presents various pieces of evidence, including a kiddie bottle and a book about Wawa, to try to prove Juicy's guilt. Despite the defense's objections, the judge ultimately finds Juicy guilty and sentences him to an unknown punishment. Throughout the trial, the dialogue is filled with humorous exchanges, memes, and pop culture references.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. The defendant, Juicy, is being tried as an adult in the US High Court of Memes.
2. The charges against Juicy include bribery, creating the "no no square," and use of outdated memes.
3. Juicy's defense attorney is trying to prove his client's innocence.
4. The prosecution has brought in evidence, including a library card and kiddie bottles.
5. The judge is also the jury and executioner in this case.
6. Juicy has pleaded "pizza" to the charges.
7. The prosecution has presented multiple pieces of evidence, including a bottle of water and a book titled "How I Met Your Wawa."
8. The defense has objected to some of the evidence presented by the prosecution.
9. The judge has allowed the prosecution to present its case, but has also allowed the defense to present its arguments.
10. The final verdict is pending, with the judge set to deliver the decision.
11. The Lolita Police Department is involved in the case.
12. The defense has requested that the judge not touch Juicy's "no no square."
13. The judge has asked the defense and prosecution to approach the front of the courtroom for the final verdict.