Twitter vs MrBeast - Summary

Summary

The author is criticizing a tweet that accuses MrBeast of wasting money by recreating the TV show "Squid Game" instead of donating it to the poor. The author argues that this criticism is hypocritical, as the person who made the tweet has not done anything to help the community themselves. The author also points out that MrBeast is a philanthropist who has done a lot to help people in need, and that his "Squid Game" video will likely raise money for his charity. The author concludes that Twitter is a platform that rewards negativity and encourages people to criticize others for not doing enough, even when they are doing more than most people.

Facts

Here are the key facts extracted from the text:

1. The speaker is discussing a tweet that criticized MrBeast for spending $2 million on a Squid Game video instead of donating the money to help the impoverished.
2. The actual Squid Game show cost $21.4 million to make.
3. The speaker argues that the tweet is hypocritical, as the person who posted it is not doing anything to help the community themselves.
4. MrBeast is known for his philanthropy and has a food bank that serves his community.
5. MrBeast's philanthropy channel donates 100% of its revenue to his food bank.
6. The speaker estimates that the person who posted the tweet has spent around 600 hours on Twitter, which could have been spent volunteering or helping the community instead.
7. The speaker believes that Twitter is a platform that rewards negativity and bullying.
8. The person who posted the tweet has 16,000 tweets on their account, indicating that they spend a significant amount of time on the platform.
9. The speaker argues that people on Twitter often criticize others for not doing enough to help the community, while not doing anything themselves.