A YouTuber made a video discussing their frustration with YouTube's handling of certain issues, including the platform's inaction on animal abuse content and the wrongful removal of one of their videos. The YouTuber claimed the removed video, which featured a staged road rage incident with people in costumes, was clearly not violent or graphic. They appealed to YouTube, but the decision was upheld, and the YouTuber was given a strike on their channel.
The YouTuber then reached out to Twitter and started a hashtag, #AnswerUsYouTube, to bring attention to the issue. Markiplier, a well-known YouTuber, joined in and posted a screenshot of the video, which he had previously featured in one of his "try not to laugh" compilations. Markiplier was then given a strike by YouTube, which the YouTuber saw as an overreach by the platform.
However, after the hashtag gained traction and Markiplier spoke out, YouTube reversed their decision, and the video was reinstated. The YouTuber thanked Markiplier and the community for their support and expressed hope that this incident would lead to positive changes within YouTube, including more open communication and a re-evaluation of their content policies.
Here are the key facts extracted from the text:
1. A YouTube creator had a video taken down for violating YouTube's policies regarding violent and graphic content.
2. The creator claimed the video was not violent or graphic and was a staged viral video from years ago.
3. The creator made a video talking about their frustration with YouTube's decision and the problems they were facing.
4. The creator's video was trending on Twitter with the hashtag #AnswerUsYouTube.
5. Markiplier, a popular YouTuber, supported the creator and tweeted about the issue.
6. Markiplier was given a strike by YouTube for his tweet.
7. YouTube later overturned their decision and reinstated the creator's video.
8. The creator thanked YouTube for reevaluating the video and understanding its context.
9. Markiplier made a video discussing the issue and offering solutions to YouTube's problems.
10. The creator believes that YouTube's enforcement of its policies is inconsistent and can lead to fear among creators.
11. The creator thinks that YouTube should be responsible for removing content that is violent and shocking.
12. Markiplier's video called out YouTube for not doing enough to address animal abuse videos on its platform.
13. The creator thanked Markiplier for his support and for putting himself at risk by speaking out on the issue.
14. The creator hopes that this ordeal will lead to positive changes at YouTube, including more open communication and trust between the platform and its creators.