These are excerpts from a transcript where a person named Penley is being questioned about his involvement in an investigation.
- Penley had not testified under oath before the House Board of Managers.
- He did speak with their investigators but was not put under oath during the impeachment proceedings.
- He believes there was a legislative privilege covering his testimony.
- He intended to tell the truth during the interview.
- He received a referral on June 17, 2020, related to a potential felony offense.
- Penley believed Ken Paxton, his boss, wanted the truth in the investigation.
- He had not conducted any active investigation in the six weeks after receiving the referral.
- There were concerns about potential alterations to federal documents.
These notes provide insight into the interactions and concerns of Penley during this investigation.
Here are the key facts extracted from the provided text:
1. The witness testified under oath but not before the House Board of Managers.
2. Andrew Murr, Jeff Lee, and Charlie Garen did not put the witness under oath during the impeachment proceedings.
3. The witness spoke with investigators but did not review the video of the meeting.
4. The witness intended to tell the truth during the testimony.
5. Exhibit 68 was introduced during the proceedings.
6. The referral from the Travis County District Attorney's Office was dated June 10, 2020.
7. The witness had the referral for six weeks without conducting any investigation.
8. Ken Paxton wanted the truth regarding the Nate Paul matter.
9. Ken Paxton did not tell the witness to interfere with an FBI investigation or obstruct justice.
10. Nate Paul made allegations about search warrants being changed after the fact.
11. Nate Paul had personal knowledge of Ronnie Saban's involvement with the search warrant.
12. The witness's notes from a meeting with Michael Wynn mention inconsistencies in signatures and stamps on papers related to the case.